Search for: "Davis v. McKinney"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 am
From Norgren v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
McKinney, 361 N.C. 53 (2006) (remanding case to trial court for determination of whether warrant was valid notwithstanding warrant application’s inclusion of information gained in unlawful search) and State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am
Davis and capital resentencing case McKinney v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm
McKinney v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
In McKinney v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
For Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times), Howard Fischer reports that in McKinney v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:17 pm
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-1 v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
Higgitt, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3211:22). [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm
Beyer travelled to McKinney, Texas to speak at a meeting of the Estate Planning and Probate Section of the Collin County Bar Association. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
McKinney School of Law; Visiting Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law Dan Svantesson - Professor and Co-Director, Centre for Commercial Law, Faculty of Law, Bond University, Australia Agenda: Black letter jurisdiction law can seem poorly suited to the questions that face courts in cases about global content deletion. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:37 am
Clabourne v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
There is still more commentary on Monday’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
We have previously noted that when a statute imposes criminal liability for knowingly disregarding a risk, it does not require a particular outcome or actions aimed at a specific individual; the crime is solely defined by the risk of injury produced by defendant's conduct (see, People v Davis, 72 NY2d 32, 36-37). [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:52 pm
In People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
For example: Andrew v. [read post]
