Search for: "Davis v. McKinney" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
McKinney, 361 N.C. 53 (2006) (remanding case to trial court for determination of whether warrant was valid notwithstanding warrant application’s inclusion of information gained in unlawful search) and State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Davis and capital resentencing case McKinney v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
For Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times), Howard Fischer reports that in McKinney v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Higgitt, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3211:22). [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Beyer travelled to McKinney, Texas to speak at a meeting of the Estate Planning and Probate Section of the Collin County Bar Association. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
McKinney School of Law; Visiting Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law Dan Svantesson - Professor and Co-Director, Centre for Commercial Law, Faculty of Law, Bond University, Australia Agenda: Black letter jurisdiction law can seem poorly suited to the questions that face courts in cases about global content deletion. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
There is still more commentary on Monday’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We have previously noted that when a statute imposes criminal liability for knowingly disregarding a risk, it does not require a particular outcome or actions aimed at a specific individual; the crime is solely defined by the risk of injury produced by defendant's conduct (see, People v Davis, 72 NY2d 32, 36-37). [read post]