Search for: "Davis v. Mills"
Results 1 - 20
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
Furthermore, it was held in Davis v United States (8th Cir. 1917) that a public trial is broadly defined as a trial at which the public is free to attend. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 10:02 am
(Linda Rosenthal, For Purpose Law Group) Moore v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Mills, and Dr. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
The judgments in question are these: BT v CU [2021] EWFC 87; [2022] 1 WLR 1349 (1 November 2021) A v M [2021] EWFC 89; [2022] 1 FCR 445 (9 November 2021) Aylward-Davies v Chesterman [2022] EWFC 4; [2022] 2 FCR 541 (4 February 2022) Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2022] EWFC 30; [2022] 2 FCR 712 (12 April 2022) XZ v YZ [2022] EWFC 49 (20 May 2022) (this being the decision granting an interim RRO in the case later reported as Gallagher v… [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
And also, a starkly different holding from the Tenth Circuit in the wake of Egbert v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
While amendments such as the one Cawthorn filed are not uncommon, ones that show large changes can trigger FEC action, said FEC spokesperson Mills Martin. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
It may be that in this regard Clibbery v Allan is now a dead letter and that Lykiardopulo was wrongly decided. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Nelson Tebbe & Micah Schwartzman, The Politics of Proportionality, (120 Michigan Law Review 1307 (2022)).Guy Baldwin, The Coronavirus Pandemic and Religious Freedom: Judicial Decisions in the United States and United Kingdom, ((2022) Judicial Review).Christopher Mills, Blake Davis & Richard Osborne, Is Viability Dicta? [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:10 pm
Christopher Mills (Spero Law LLC; Charleston School of Law), Blake Davis (Wake Forest University - School of Law), & Richard Osborne (Regent University - School of Law) have posted Is Viability Dicta? [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 3:32 pm
–Editing by Rich Mills. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 12:26 pm
Mills and Dr. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
And if the case is seen as run-of-the-mill within its category, then allowing pseudonymity would imply that other cases in the category should be pseudonymized as well. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm
Available at Westlaw Australia. [5] Alex Mills, Party Autonomy in Private International Law (CUP, 2018) 53, citing Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co v Shand (1865) 16 ER 103. [6] Alex Mills, The Confluence of Public and Private International Law (CUP, 2009), 53. [7] Antony Gibbs & Sons v Société Industrielle et Commerciale des Métaux (1890) 25 QBD 399, 405 (Gibbs). [8] Alex Mills, Party Autonomy in Private International… [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding… [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding… [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:30 am
Supreme Court has misleading opponents and potentially huge impact – we weigh in on the side of transparency & prosecution of bad actors: CalNonprofitsGene: Americans for Prosperity v. [read post]
