Search for: "Davis v. Municipal Court (1988)"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2023, 5:20 pm
Municipal Court (1988) 46 Cal.3d 64.) [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:43 pm
Municipal Court(1988) 46 Cal.3d 64, 75.) [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Recognizing Birmingham’s right to speak free from state interference was indicated by Supreme Court precedent, the judge observed, because the Court, as early as 1960 in Gomillion v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases like Ward v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Pappas (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 201, 208, italics added.) [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The first was New York v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849, 853 (Tex. 2002). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
The Second Circuit says state and municipal officials ought not to be constrained by state law from “voluntarily” cooperating with the feds, but state and municipal officials in this setting are not operating as private citizens—they are operating as state government actors. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court observed in the famous New York Times v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
