Search for: "Davis v. Muse" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2015, 5:51 am by Stefan Passantino
 Davis’ note undertakes a thorough analysis of pay-to-play and Supreme Court jurisprudence as articulated through cases such as McCutcheon v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:25 am by Dennis Wilkins
I have no doubt that, between her and McCain that Roe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:51 am by Stefan Passantino
 Davis’ note undertakes a thorough analysis of pay-to-play and Supreme Court jurisprudence as articulated through cases such as McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:51 am by Stefan Passantino
 Davis’ note undertakes a thorough analysis of pay-to-play and Supreme Court jurisprudence as articulated through cases such as McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
The Supreme Court term that began Monday marks the sixth year that we have regularly wasted the time of SCOTUSblog readers with our musings on the Supreme Court’s “Shadow Docket”; even before that, we detracted from the Internet’s exclusive focus on the Kardashians, hate speech, and porn with our intermittent musings on relisted cases. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 2:12 pm
Davis, whose petition is currently pending before the Court. [read post]
17 May 2012, 11:48 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Attorney O’s Midnight Musings Blog on Facebook for all blog posts from that blog as well as other legal news. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 6:12 am
Topics featured in this issue include the following:* Gillian Davies, formerly of the European Patent Office and now a barrister in Hogarth Chambers, summarises significant decisions of the EPO boards of appeal in 2007;* Birgit Clark (Boult Wade Tennant) discusses the German Bundesgerichtshof COOL WATER/ICY COLD decision on the legitimacy or otherwise of allusive product names as a means of comparative advertising for imitative perfumes;* Marianne Schaffner and Sandra Georges (from… [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:45 am by Venkat
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm by JB
Davis and Personnel Director v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:56 pm by Peter Tillers
But such a defense of the debate about mathematical analysis of evidence is a bit like saying that WWII was a good thing because it led to the development of V-2 rockets. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
Merpel muses that this appears at first sight to have been a strange application for Lundbeck to make. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, aptly described by the chief justice “as a Justice with extensive experience in state and local politics,” recognized this fact almost 40 years ago, writing in Davis v. [read post]