Search for: "Davis v. North Carolina" Results 1 - 20 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 6:36 am by Alex Phipps
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on January 17, 2023. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Karlan[1]  On the eve of the Supreme Court’s hearing Davis v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
First, a full complement of nine Justices will participate in the University of North Carolina case, while only eight Justices will participate in the Harvard case (because Justice Jackson has recused herself). [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  It is curated by Mary Ziegler, UC Davis School of Law (Harvard Gazette).Randall Kennedy, HLS, interviewed on Walker v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Harper, a congressional-districting dispute from North Carolina that raises the so-called “Independent State Legislature (ISL)” theory. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Affirmative action disputes from Harvard and the University of North Carolina, and a partisan gerrymandering case, Moore v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” This justification applies fully to ISL; to the extent that the North Carolina Supreme Court’s rejection of ISL is in tension with a small number of old cases from other courts, the judgment in the North Carolina Supreme Court case is obviously correct.A second accepted reason for summary affirmance is that the “Supreme Court itself has just decided the point on which the conflict exists. [read post]