Search for: "Davis v. Phillips"
Results 21 - 40
of 244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2012, 12:28 pm
Reversed.Case Name: CONNIE MARIE POWELL v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:32 am
Phillips, Attorney General; David L. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:26 am
DELOGE v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 3:03 pm
28 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
These decisions are Phillips et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:08 am
Sharon Davis - Click here for more information on Sharon Davis. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm
Arkansas Law Review Examines the Lessons of Korematsu v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:30 am
Justice Davis delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:28 am
By Stevie Phillips In State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 5:09 am
I wrote previously about the Apache Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 8:33 am
Orion IP, LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:13 am
I presented with Mark Katz from Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP in Toronto. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
"Tom Frost (University of Leicester) has posted a "teaching resource" of interest: "Phillips v Eyre – A Study of Constitutional Law and Empire. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct investigations FTC Chair Lina Khan was… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:28 am
By Stevie Phillips In State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:28 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:06 am
A violation of the statute may be established by evidence of the defendant’s alleged deceit (see Scarborough v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP, 63 AD3d 1531, 1533 [4th Dept 2009]; Izko Sportswear Co., Inc. v Flaum, 25 AD3d 534, 537 [2d Dept 2006]), but “alleged deceit that is not directed at a court must occur in the course of ‘a pending judicial proceeding’ ” (Hansen v Caffry, 280 AD2d 704, 705 [3d Dept 2001], lv… [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 11:06 am
" Phillips v. [read post]
