Search for: "Davis v. Sharp"
Results 1 - 20
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Judge Liman, who has dismissed ADA website cases based on lack of standing, found that standing was sufficiently pled in Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Sharp, Comparative Frameworks for a Human Rights-Based Approach to Psychedelics, (March 8, 2024).Barkha Singh, Normalization of the Exceptional State Under Unlawful Activities and Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2019 – Umar Khalid V. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Former President Donald Trump has promised voters that, if re-elected, he would “immediately” invoke the Alien Enemies Act to effect mass deportations of non-citizens from Mexico. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
" A raking shot refers to a shot fired from a sharp, or acute angle. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
On the close connection test, Nicola Davies LJ concluded as follows: “[PXM] had no caring or pastoral responsibility for the pupils, a factor to which considerable weight is given in previous cases. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law). [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
The BBC, The Guardian and SkyNews covered the report that lead to Sharp’s resignation. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm
For example, a university taking and announcing a position on the (contested) issue of how easy it should be for foreign graduate students to obtain visas (something that distinctively affects the university itself—and not just its population—as an institution) seems very different to us than weighing in on the correctness of last year’s Second Amendment ruling by the Supreme Court ruling striking down New York’s public-carry law or the Court’s Dobbs ruling overturning… [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:05 am
In Davis v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Dykes v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
” In context, this word generally (as in Articles I and II) means a state’s lawmaking system—as the Supreme Court has repeatedly held in a century-old line of cases from Ohio ex rel Davis v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm
GermanyDer Dritte Weg v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
”The matter is really no different from what Chief Justice John Marshall said in Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
(See Pate v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
On 16 December 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Spano v De Souza. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Rather, the First Amendment recognizes “a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
The Claimant succeeded in her libel claim in Terri Ann Davies v Gavin Paul Carter [2021] EWHC 3021 (QB). [read post]
