Search for: "Davis v. Sharp"
Results 41 - 60
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2020, 8:37 am
There were, in substance, three points which were decided in Google’s favour by Warby J ([2018] EWHC 2599 (QB)) and on which his judgment was overturned by the Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ), namely Whether a “uniform per capita” amount of compensation can be awarded for “loss of control” for a non-trivial breach of the DPA even if the breach causes no material damage or distress? [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
This is so because a valid license ʺimmunizes the licensee from a charge of copyright infringement, provided that the licensee uses the copyright as agreed with the licensor.ʺ Davis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
Vos C (Sharp P and Davis LJ concurring) said that the Court had been right in Vidal-Hall to give an autonomous meaning to Article 23 DPD and section 13 of the 1998 Act, and to construe both on the basis that they were giving effect to Article 8 CFR and Article 47 CFR (he might, with profit, have referred to Article 7 CFR as well). [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal (with the Chancellor giving the only substantive judgment), granting him permission to serve out. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Davis, and whose expansive views about equal protection are exemplified by his willingness in Frontiero v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
Murphy (now Sharp v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
” For generations since, first-year contracts professors have used Lumley v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
On 22 and 23 July 2019 the same judge heard the trial in the case of Fentiman v Marsh. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
On 16 and 17 July 2019 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Vos C and Davis LJ) heard the appeal against the judgment of Warby J in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 9 July 2019 Sharp P and Warby J handed down judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Yaxley-Lennon [2019] EWHC 1791 (QB). [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
Justice Gorsuch penned the majority opinion, available here: https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-davis-2053. 8. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Martha Davis's excellent Brutal Need (1993) discusses him in some depth in a chapter on the road to Goldberg v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
In Iancu v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The first was New York v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
But the two opinions also express seemingly sharp disagreement on stare decisis. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
We had a summary of this by Oscar Davies: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court observed in the famous New York Times v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
The following year, the Court held, in Davis v. [read post]
