Search for: "Davis v. Sharp" Results 81 - 100 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 1 April 2015, Nicola Davies J will hand down judgment in Lachaux v AOL Ltd.. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
This is so because a valid license ʺimmunizes the licensee from a charge of copyright infringement, provided that the licensee uses the copyright as agreed with the licensor.ʺ Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am by Daniel Hemel
Wayfair also was a sharp break from Kennedy’s dormant commerce clause jurisprudence over the preceding three decades. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
Piepenbrock v London School of Economics, heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:45 am by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
 heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
In the Court of Appeal, Lord Justice Davis (with whom Lady Justice Sharp and Lord Justice McFarlane agreed) dismissed the appeal, and agreed with the claimant’s lawyers that Mr Justice Warby had erred. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Optical Express v Associated Newspapers Ltd, 16 November 2016 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Piepenbrock v London School of Economics, heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
 Opposing him is Professor Stephen Davies, Sir Jack's successor as Waynflete Professor of Chemistry at the University of Oxford and a pretty legendary figure in his own right. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Last year, Davies publicly accused Kurd of plagiarising a gag that compares a smart fridge to a nagging wife. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
The Supreme Court has wrestled with the concept of how much partisanship is too much since first finding partisan-gerrymandering claims justiciable in Davis v. [read post]