Search for: "Davis v. Smith"
Results 221 - 240
of 690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849, 855 (Tex. 2002). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:48 am
Randy Smith, and Stephen Reinhardt -- the last of the 3 having denied the motion to disqualify himself filed by proponents of the ban, contained in the state's Constitution as a result of voters' approval of a 2008 ballot initiative, Proposition 8 (prior IntLawGrrls posts available here).The Ninth Circuit has decided to permit live dissemination of the arguments in the case, Perry v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:03 am
Davie, Chance and White. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (4): Marie Davis v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:48 pm
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm
The two lead claimants, David Davis MP and Tom Watson MP, were represented by Liberty. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:19 am
Smith v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
The Court also relisted in Davis v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:24 am
Smith; concurrence by Fisher with B. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:43 am
Smith, 2013-Ohio-855 (12th Dist.) [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Smith. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:28 am
One such reported case is that of Kevin Smith v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 7:22 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
Davis v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:04 pm
Oral argument today at SCOTUS in Southern Union Company v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
At the same time, I think the legality of the monitoring has to be justified under Knotts as limited by Karo rather than under the broader third party doctrine cases like Smith v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Ct. 695 (2009), and Davis v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:05 pm
Smith (April 17): When the statute of limitations begins to run for a federal civil rights claim alleging that prosecutors fabricated evidence in a criminal proceeding Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]