Search for: "Davis v. Smith" Results 241 - 260 of 690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 10, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND CURRAN, JJ. 402 CA 21-01479 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF AMY NEWMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, vCITY OF TONAWANDA, RICK DAVIS, AS MAYOR OF CITY OF TONAWANDA, AND CHARLES STUART, FIRE CHIEF OF CITY OF TONAWANDA, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 10, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND CURRAN, JJ. 402 CA 21-01479 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF AMY NEWMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, vCITY OF TONAWANDA, RICK DAVIS, AS MAYOR OF CITY OF TONAWANDA, AND CHARLES STUART, FIRE CHIEF OF CITY OF TONAWANDA, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
  In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:58 pm by Lisa McElroy
Sometime similar happened to Willie Gene Davis, the petitioner in Davis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:41 am
From Smith, it cannot be derived if and, if so, how the enantiomer has actually been obtained in individualized form. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Smith; and (3) whether the Supreme Court should reaffirm Smith’s hybrid-rights doctrine, applying strict scrutiny to free exercise claims that implicate other fundamental rights, and resolve the circuit split over the doctrine’s precedential status. [read post]