Search for: "Davis v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 4,564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2020, 3:21 am by Walter Olson
If you think reopening a retail business with new distancing rules is a challenge, wait till you see the interplay with the ADA, as I explain in my new post at Cato; Court dismisses class action against Wendy’s on behalf of disabled persons unable to use after-hours drive-up service as a walk-up [Davis v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
I will then describe an important workaround, first described by Professor Darien Shanske of the University of California at Davis, that would allow the Federal Reserve to give assistance to states and cities without interference from Republicans in the Senate or the White House.Punishing One’s Own Troops: How Could a Crisis of This Magnitude Not Call for All Hands on Deck? [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  And as Buckley points out, the case that presented the greatest challenge in this regard was Confederate President Jefferson Davis’s treason prosecution.The Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:49 am by SHG
As anyone familiar with the actual law in Davis v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For example, conservative jurists in cases like Town of Greece v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:51 am by Guest
One is the case of Davis v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] AC 696, from which we get Lord Radcliffe’s celebrated language of ‘radical difference’. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:33 pm by Guest
It was not this that I promised to do– [Per Lord Radcliffe, Davis Contractors Ltd. v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] AC 696, 729]. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  After all, in 1841 we get the first of the Supreme Court’s slavery point-counter points in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 4:00 am by Joshua Waterston
Ziff Davis has removed the image from its current version of the article. [read post]