Search for: "Davis v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2007, 9:16 pm
Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
Superior Court, Tyrrell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
” I am happy to report that the most significant post-Rucho ruling by a state court has done just that.On September 3, a three-judge state North Carolina Superior Court panel ruled, in Common Cause v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Superior Court, 95 Cal. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker Herein, highlights from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Briggs, et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:06 am
Today the Washington Supreme Court hears arguments in King v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1064; Molien v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
C.S.A. 5930, in the case of Davis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:56 am
” In the denial of the cellphone tower data case (Davis v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:09 pm
Have a central location -- maybe as part of the superior court's web site -- where all these notices can be made. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
And absent such a showing, the University is not violating the Constitution under the Davis opinion.It is true that for a while now the Court has held that all racial classifications get strict scrutiny, which is the reason the Court struck down Virginia's ban on interracial marriages in Loving v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 7:51 am
AES and Quebec v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:24 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:33 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court upheld consecutive sentences on the theory that the evidence was sufficient to permit a jury to find the striking to support one count and the shooting the other. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
Superior Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 147; Taylor v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:22 pm
Stennis to judgeships in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:56 am
In re Davis, 114 N.C. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:47 am
As far back as 1916, in Davis v. [read post]