Search for: "Davis v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,027
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:29 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
United States and the tax in Moore v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:20 pm
On June 3, 2019, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am
United States and Dimaya v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:08 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 10:26 pm
The New Mexico Supreme Court pointed out that the Court of Appeals' discussion was unnecessary speculation.This approach is consistent with the United States Supreme Court's approach in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:11 pm
Yesterday's SCOTUS decision in Davis v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 11:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
On November 20, 2007, the United States District Judge Michael J. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:00 am
” Second, is the mere placement of a buy order in the United States for the purchase of foreign securities on a foreign exchange sufficient to allege that a purchaser incurred irrevocable liability in the United States, such that the U.S. securities laws govern the purchase of those securities under the Second Circuit’s decision in Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:45 am
The United States Supreme Court Justices will read a brief from one of the youngest lawyers ever to file before the high court. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:55 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
Davis, does not include disparate impact as anything more than evidence of the unlawful discriminatory purpose that the 14th Amendment outlaws. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:46 am
By Stevie PhillipsIn a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion handed down on September 26, Chief Justice Wade outlines the historical development of state and federal sentencing guidelines.In short, he observes that the 2005 amendments to Tennessee's 1989 Sentencing Act were passed for the purpose of bringing our sentencing scheme in line with United States Supreme Court sentencing decisions, namely Apprendi and its progeny. [read post]
