Search for: "Davis v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 2,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” The third category of the statute thus prefers people who are 65 or older, giving them an entitlement to early voting by mail that younger persons do not enjoy unless they satisfy additional criteria.Plaintiffs challenged this law as violative of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides—also quite straightforwardly—that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied… [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Eugene Davis authored an important special concurrence to his own opinion in a seaman status case, Sanchez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Eugene Davis authored an important special concurrence to his own opinion in a seaman status case, Sanchez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Eugene Davis authored an important special concurrence to his own opinion in a seaman status case, Sanchez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Eugene Davis authored an important special concurrence to his own opinion in a seaman status case, Sanchez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Start by believing what you saw in the Jacob Blake video and accepting that racism is very much alive (but not well) in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:30 am by Neil H. Buchanan
"  There, I discussed another major achievement of the Civil Rights era, when Congress and the states adopted the 24th Amendment to the United States Constitution, the pertinent part of which reads: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote ... shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Indeed, one expert in the employ of the United States government, who would go on to become a major testifying expert witness for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation, opined in a 1973 publication, that mesothelioma was a problem limited to exposure to South African crocidolite, which was not in every asbestos-containing insulation product.[9] In any event, Judge Wisdom never directly addressed Section 388, and the framing of the Borel case as a consumer case prevailed. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
 In this plantworker case, I represented Carey-Canada in what turned out to be one of its last cases in the United States, before filing for bankruptcy. [read post]