Search for: "Davis v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 3,026
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am by Giles Peaker
” The review decision barely dealt with this, stating: “140. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The News Media Association (NMA) and National Union of Journalists issued statements stating that the changes would “weaken the flow of information from police forces to the general public, undermining the public right to know. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
Bush appointed her to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:03 am by Guest Author
At the oral arguments in two currently pending Supreme Court cases—United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
United States The US Copyright Office has rejected an attempt to register copyright in an image generated by AI tools. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by W. Casey Biggerstaff
DoD’s Law of War Manual, § 15.4.2; the current availability of which is contested, see Bothe ¶ 28; Davis). [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council (2023) EWCA Civ 80 – the Court of Appeal on residual diminution in value/blight in nuisance cases (here Japanese knotweed) – it is not ‘pure economic loss, and is recoverable in damages. [read post]