Search for: "Davis v. Wallace" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Hayley Evans
While some, such as Security Minister Ben Wallace, argue that Tuesday’s ruling in SSHD v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action, or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010; Lamanna v Pearson & Shapiro, 43 AD3d 1111; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691). [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:36 am by Lindsay Griffiths
    Plaintiff Spoliates Self And Her Case Dismissed from Epstein Becker & Green: EBG delves into Mangione v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 N.Y.3d at 442, 835 N.Y.S.2d 534, 867 N.E.2d 385; Davis v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Moore, has been issuing statements about the limits of federal power that remind many observers of the days of George Wallace, and maybe even Jefferson Davis. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:34 pm by Giles Peaker
” Furthermore, as Morritt LJ observed in Wallace v Manchester City Council, damages are not invariably calculated by reference to a notional reduction in rent but may alternatively be expressed as a global award or a combination of the two. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Federal Judge Strikes Down Pennsylvania Same-Sex Marriage Ban – Harrisburg lawyer Lee Tankle of McNees Wallace & Nurick on the firm’s Pennsylvania Labor & Employment Blog Oklahoma Joins the Patent Troll Hunt – Jacob Martinez and Tod Melgar of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives Cybersecurity Securities Class Actions are Coming: Predictions, Analysis, and Practical Guidance – Seattle attorney Douglas Greene of Lane Powell on the… [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:55 am
Jay Wallace (University of California, Berkeley)12:45-1:05pmCommentaryPekka Väyrynen (University of California, Davis)1:05-1:45pmDiscussion SessionEND OF CONFERENCEAgain, conference registration is free but required for attendance. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:56 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The court concluded that site-specific standing is required to bring each section 4(f) claim, citing Davis v. [read post]