Search for: "Davis v. Washington" Results 241 - 260 of 1,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2009, 12:40 pm
Barkow NOTES The Reasonable Child Declarant After Davis v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
  H/t: Julian Davis Mortenson and Rachel Sheldon. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 pm by News Desk
“We have great shellfish in Washington and we want people to enjoy them – safely,” said Jerrod Davis, director of the agency’s Office of Shellfish and Water Protection. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:15 am by Dennis Crouch
”  The brief – filed by Mark Davies – argues that a product’s visual design is critically important in the sales of complex products. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:39 am by Randazza
The Washington Supreme Court struck down the Washington statute as unconstitutional in Davis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
Legal Foundation of Washington (2003) -- no takings violation in IOLTA funding schemeAmerican Insurance Ass'n v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 3:47 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
The State has not shown that this case presents the type of ongoing emergency, described in Davis[ v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:10 am by Adam Chandler
At ACSblog, Martha Davis marks International Women’s Day with a discussion of Flores-Villar v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
Grant, 108 P.3d 768 (Washington Supreme Court 2005). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:40 pm by Rick Hasen
   Perhaps most relevant is this in-chambers opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Lux v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We also have some SCOTUS talk on LXBN TV as Antoinette Konski joins us to talk Mayo v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:43 am by David Markus
This morning in the Washington Post, the lawyer who successfully argued Smith v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am by Edith Roberts
Robert Barnes covered the argument for The Washington Post, as did Mark Sherman and Sam Hananel for the Associated Press. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am by MBettman
Washington, 542 U.S.296 (2004) (Striking down  Washington’s criminal sentencing procedures that allowed a judge rather than a jury to make findings that increased the penalty beyond the statutory maximum.) [read post]