Search for: "Davis v. Washington" Results 401 - 420 of 1,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2017, 9:39 am by Randazza
The Washington Supreme Court struck down the Washington statute as unconstitutional in Davis v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage focusing on the confirmation process ahead comes from Sean Sullivan and others at The Washington Post; Susan Davis at NPR; Tom Lo Bianco at CNN; Jeff Greenfield at Politico, as well as Burgess Everett and others and Seung Ming Kim; Michael McAuliff at The Huffington Post, along with Igor Bobic and Jennifer Bendery; and Stephen Dinan in The Washington Times. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
USA Mark Grabowski in the Washington Examiner has argued that Donald Trump has grounds for a libel claim against BuzzFeed after they published a report about his alleged ties to Russia. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Davis, No. 16-6219, involves the continuing fallout from Martinez v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:53 am by Broc Romanek
General counsel are clearly bothered by the ruling, according to Amar Sarwal, vice president and chief legal strategist for the Association of Corporate Counsel in Washington, D.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
 heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) heard the important “serious harm” appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
Briefly: At Human Rights At Home Blog, Martha Davis reviews last week’s argument in Lynch v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Tracermarks have become important (for example in Washington's marijuana business regulation)--tracing sourcing in supply chains (GMA [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 4:46 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage of Wednesday’s argument in Buck v. [read post]