Search for: "Davis v. Washington" Results 421 - 440 of 1,207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) heard the important “serious harm” appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
Briefly: At Human Rights At Home Blog, Martha Davis reviews last week’s argument in Lynch v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Tracermarks have become important (for example in Washington's marijuana business regulation)--tracing sourcing in supply chains (GMA [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 4:46 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage of Wednesday’s argument in Buck v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am by Edith Roberts
Robert Barnes covered the argument for The Washington Post, as did Mark Sherman and Sam Hananel for the Associated Press. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
Additional previews of the cases appear in The George Washington Law Review’s On The Docket. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage of last week’s cert grant in Lee v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
” ImmigrationProf Blog discusses Lynch v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Steve Lubet
Baraniuk, MD Professor, Department of Medicine Georgetown University Washington, D.C. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Karpoff, University of Washington, on Monday, August 15, 2016 Tags: Acquisitions, Agency costs, Antitakeover, Boards of Directors, Entrenchment, Firm valuation, Hostile takeover,Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Poison pills, Shareholder value, Takeover defenses, Takeovers The Law and Brexit III Posted by Thomas J. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:15 am by Dennis Crouch
”  The brief – filed by Mark Davies – argues that a product’s visual design is critically important in the sales of complex products. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]