Search for: "Davis v. Washington" Results 161 - 180 of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2008, 12:13 pm
Mark Simon Davies is a counsel in O’Melveny & Myers LLP’s Washington, D.C. office. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
Justice Scalia’s rigid, formalistic approach to testimonial statements in Davis v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:42 pm by Georgetown Law Journal
Dean Kevin Johnson, University of California Davis School of Law, How Racial Profiling in America Became the Law of the Land: United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at the Washington Examiner, Adam Carrington welcomes the result as “an affirmation of the rule of law. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by Brian Shiffrin
We must therefore determine whether the statements were "testimonial," because only testimonial statements are subject to the Confrontation Clause (see Davis v Washington, 547 US 813, 821).In Brown (13 NY3d at 336), the report in question contained machine-generated raw data, graphs and charts of a male specimen's DNA characteristics that were isolated from a rape kit. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:03 am
Burger King Corp (Craig Runyon) The Practical Effects of the Ruling in Davis v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm by Karen Gullo
Law Is Causing Online Censorship and Removal of Protected Speech Washington, D.C. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
Hawaii in a pithy headline for the Washington Post: “In travel ban case, Supreme Court considers ‘the president’ vs. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:04 am by MBettman
Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 822, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165 L.Ed.2d 224 (2006), and State v. [read post]