Search for: "Dawn Johnsen"
Results 1 - 20
of 238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2021, 7:50 am
Professors Dawn Johnsen and Marty Lederman at OLC? [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 11:04 am
The opinion, issued by Acting Assistant Attorney General Dawn Johnsen, suggests that, while congressional committees must have a valid reason for requesting information from the executive branch, “officials must apply a presumption that Legislative Branch officials act in good faith and in furtherance of legitimate objectives. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:10 pm
Dawn Johnsen has been acting now for several months. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:39 pm
Other law profs on the Justice team are Dawn Johnsen (Indiana), Pam Karlan (Stanford), Richard Lazarus (Harvard), Marty Lederman (Georgetown), Barb McQuade (Michigan), and Christina Rodriguez (Yale). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020).Amanda Hollis-BruskyTaking Back the Constitution is an ambitious book that covers a wide swath of territory in its attempt to explain, critique and offer alternatives to the contemporary Supreme Court and its constitutional agenda. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:38 pm
Our organizations invited back Professors Rachel Moran and Dawn Johnsen to reflect on their contributions to The Constitution in 2020, the influence of the broader project, and contemporary prospects for positive constitutional change. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 11:30 am
This week, Michelle Layser (Illinois) reviews Dawn Johnsen (Indiana – Bloomington) and Walter E. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
The literature on this question is deep, but for those interested in taking a dive, there are three useful articles (by Dawn Johnsen, David Barron, and Peter Strauss) published in Law & Contemporary Problems in 2000, and there have been good more recent contributions to the debate by Professors Daniel Meltzer, Saikrishna Prakash, and Joseph Landau. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:03 am
” Dawn Johnsen offered similar guidance earlier this year, writing that “Courts attend to reality and context, and they can and should adapt their screens of deference when circumstances so indicate. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:27 am
Lawprof Dawn Johnsen, at the WeHateTump blog, argues that he’s not entitled to the deference otherwise shown presidents: It is time to ask: Has Trump in effect forfeited some measure of judicial deference across contexts and cases, through his disrespect for the courts and the rule of law and his displays of prejudice and arbitrary decisionmaking? [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
Recently, law professor Dawn Johnsen provided a guide: Trump’s extraordinary—indeed, unprecedented— behavior more generally means that he is not due the deference traditionally afforded presidents. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
Matthew Waxman responded to Dawn Johnsen’s essay on the Obama administration’s security legacy in Foreign Affairs, arguing that Johnsen misreads Obama’s mode of operating within the Youngstown framework. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
Before dawn this morning, the U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:00 pm
Dawn Johnsen has a new essay in Foreign Affairs defending the Obama administration’s national security law legacy and drawing lessons for constraining the incoming Trump administration. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:16 am
Dawn Johnsen is Walter W. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 7:18 am
The second is a reply from Dawn Johnsen. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
Not Indiana lawprof Dawn Johnsen, however, who offered this parenthetical: (I note that by using Judge Posner rather than “Dick,” I hope I am being appropriately but not “too respectful;” addressing a judge known from clerkship days by his first name feels to me as unnatural as would calling my fourth-grade teacher “Lee” and not Mr. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 8:50 pm
" Dawn Johnsen has a post titled "The only good ruling would strike down Texas' terrible laws. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm
" And law professor Dawn Johnsen has a post titled "How can a judge dismiss the importance of the Constitution? [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:48 pm
" And Dawn Johnsen has the second entry, titled "Wither the full court. [read post]
