Search for: "Day v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 59,944
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
In the case of Hicks v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 2:01 pm
But now, most cases are (and must be) e-filed, typically using service providers, and the case isn't technically "filed" until after the Clerk "processes" the complaint and officially "files" it, which may be several days (or even a week) later.(2) Both now and in the old days, you've got 30 days to remove a lawsuit from state court to federal court. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm
In Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 11:29 am
Coleman v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives) in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
“This acquisition dovetails with our vision of building a suite of products that combine our subject-matter expertise with advanced technologies such as generative AI to support attorneys’ day-to-day workflow. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
California’s 60-Day “For Further Study Rule. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's decision by Judge Denise Cote (S.D.N.Y.) in Farrakhan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The report must be submitted within 120 days of the EO, so on or before June 27, 2024. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm
Using a small business or subchapter V filing can speed up the chapter 11 bankruptcy process as well as bring down the cost. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 2:43 pm
In 2022 the Supreme Court of Canada considered the issue of family violence in Barendregt v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:05 am
McDaniel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
Under the doctrine, named after the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
Connell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
The Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
Act’s provision allowing a majority in interest, within 90 days after the dissociation of a general partner, to “admit at least one general partner” in order to avoid dissolution of the partnership, or Cheloniidae’s succession was barred by provision in the L.P. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In last year's landmark affirmative action case, SFFA v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
