Search for: "Day v. Walton" Results 1 - 20 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
With regard to his status as a campaigner against Pride and the use of the Pride and Progress Pride flag, the Acting Chancellor referred to his original decision in which he took the relevant law on the question of standing from Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44. at [92] and [94]. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm by News Desk
Most worked earlier or later in the day than the law permits and more than three hours on school days. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 12:38 am by David Pocklington
Drawing upon the Scottish case Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44 and AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors [2011] UKSC 46, the Deputy Chancellor considered the nine objections that had been received by the Registry on the basis of the details they provided [10]. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm by Cindy Cohn
They understood how illegal the NSA’s spying was and were resolute in demanding their day in court. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[64] And if one day social media executives and other influential employees see some speech as not just ideologically offensive but highly economically threatening—for instance, urging regulations that they think would be devastating to their businesses—wouldn't it be especially likely that they would try to tamp it down? [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 12:29 pm by Russell Knight
All of us carry a tiny computer on us or next to us 24 hours a day that we refer to by just one of it’s functions: a phone. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 8:02 am by Elliot Setzer
Circuit ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:57 am by Michael Kimberly
As Justice Antonin Scalia put it in his concurrence in Walton v. [read post]