Search for: "De Montigny v. De Montigny" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
De Montigny J.A. stated that the location of the facility was entirely a zoning issue. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Similarly, Justice de Montigny considered the file history in Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 5:32 am by David Fraser
In de Montigny, the Supreme Court stated as follows: [47] While compensatory damages are awarded to compensate for the prejudice resulting from fault, exemplary damages serve a different purpose. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Astrazeneca Canada Inc., 2012 FC 559 by Justice Hughes and of accounting experts for a copyright counterclaim by Justice de Montigny in Distrimedic Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC, 2015 FC 17[7] [tadalafil Notice of Compliance case (“NOC”)], Justice de Montigny accepted that Eli Lilly’s patent for the new use of a drug to treat erectile dysfunction (“ED”) only promised ED treatment. [read post]