Search for: "De Canas v. Bica" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2010, 6:06 am by JB
De Canas upheld a California law which made it a crime to knowingly hire an illegal aliens; the decision has lots of language that gives states plenty of room to pass immigration regulations consistent with federal law. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:46 pm by Julian Ku
Supreme Court looked at this issue was in 1976 [in a case called De Canas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:13 pm by Rick Hills
The difficulty, of course, is that the "field" of "immigration" is hardly well-demarcated: If De Canas v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
Yet the Court also reaffirmed language in De Canas v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:59 am by Jack Chin
As a constitutional matter, Whiting breaks no new ground; it is merely an application of De Canas v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
While this might suggest that any state or local laws targeted at immigrants in areas within the federal domain would be field preempted, in 1976, in De Canas v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:24 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
UPDATE: It appears I did misunderstand what Balkin meant, and he has made a small clarifying edit to the language I quote above to make clear that he thinks the argument that this law is preempted is stronger than was the case in De Canas v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The state relies primarily on a 1976 case, De Canas v. [read post]