Search for: "De Witt v State"
Results 61 - 80
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2020, 3:15 am
Hearthside Baking, Scafom International BV v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
 The Court directed that the parties address three issues in a supplemental briefing: “(1) whether, in light of Van Vliet v Vander Naald, 290 Mich 365 (1939), Westerhouse v De Witt, 215 Mich 295 (1921), and Howard v Dickie, 120 Mich 238 (1899), the reciprocal duty or interest giving rise to the qualified privilege at issue in this case applies to all church members generally, or only to members who are decision makers engaged in… [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am
John Witte Jr, Canopy Forum: Religious Freedom in the Western Legal Tradition. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
” Instead, the Framers drafted a Constitution that required the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” for the appointment of “Officers of the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am
The announcement comes a month after China’s anger was provoked by a State Department report claiming that China had been limiting counterterrorism cooperation with the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:08 am
Israel has stated that while it de facto applies the humanitarian provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, it does not recognize its de jure application to the occupied Palestinian territory. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:40 am
Having a federal prison located on a naval base outside the de jure territorial limits of the United States is not something that ought to give anyone much heartburn from a Constitutional law perspective. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:00 pm
In a recent case, these industry guidelines were adopted as a de facto standard. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:00 pm
In a recent case, these industry guidelines were adopted as a de facto standard. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Force v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 10:34 am
A Recent Judgment on the Irish Workplace Dispute Resolution System In Zalewski v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
Finally, in concluding his analysis of the constitutionality of the relevant chapter of the Act, MacMenamin J referred to Demir v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:18 am
A similar dispute arose later in the Djibouti v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Summers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
For an outline of the proposition, see the State of California’s voter website. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See also United Mexican States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 10:41 am
The Guidelines for Examination, Part F, V, 9, state that “no objection on account of lack of unity a priori is justified in respect of a dependent claim and the claim on which it depends, on the ground that the general concept they have in common is the subject-matter of the independent claim, which is also contained in the dependent claim”. [read post]
