Search for: "De Zapata v City of New York"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
Having been the basis for decisions in likely thousands of cases, De Bour has become an integral part of New York jurisprudence. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
AT&T Corp., 14 So. 3d 1224, 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding that a venue provision was mandatory where it provided: “The parties consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in New York City, USA. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
AT&T Corp., 14 So. 3d 1224, 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding that a venue provision was mandatory where it provided: “The parties consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in New York City, USA. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
I must confess that that may set a new bar for resistance to change.) [read post]
