Search for: "DePierre v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 4:43 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:37 am
Yesterday, in DePierre v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:57 pm
United States, Allen v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:21 am
United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
In DePierre v United States the question is how does should “cocaine base” be defined. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
13 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
On Thursday in DePierre v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:02 am
United States, No. 09-1533. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:21 pm
” DePierre filed a petition for certiorari, which the United States opposed. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] in DePierre v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:10 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] Monday in DePierre v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm
At Monday’s oral argument in DePierre v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm
United States and Microsoft v. i4i garnered the most coverage. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
EMA or United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:27 am
United StatesDocket: 09-1533Brief Summary: DePierre was convicted of distributing 50 grams or more of cocaine base, a federal crime under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:31 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:15 am
UNITED STATES, EX REL. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
Ditto United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Guarnieri (Granted )Docket: 09-1476Issue(s): Whether state and local government employees may sue their employers for retaliation under the First Amendment’s Petition Clause when they petitioned the government on matters of private concern.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (3d Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs Title: DePierre v. [read post]
