Search for: "Dearing v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2007, 3:45 am
(I have no idea why this wasn't posted on the online docket until a month after it was filed.)No. 06A754 Title: United States, Applicant v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
Brian DEARING, Petitioner, v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:15 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
On February 4, 2025, the Department of Education issued a “Dear Colleague” letter stating that it will enforce Title IX pursuant to the 2020 Title IX Rule instead of the 2024 Title IX Rule. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
From a supplement to a self-represented appellant's brief in Shaver v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 2:51 pm by FDABlog HPM
Mensing in the context of a preemption defense in a state tort-law failure-to-warn case, Nevada State Court Judge Jerry Wiese II recently granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Preemption Defense for Dear Doctor Liability in three propofol hepatitis infection cases – Carol Keck v. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 10:55 am by Shani Zaritsky
Surprising to no one, the Department of Education has finally issued a Dear Colleague Letter clarifying that the 2020 Title IX regulations are again the law of the land. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:07 am
This guest Kat steps briefly out of his comfort zone to bring his dear readers slightly belated news of the Court of Appeal decision, handed down on 10 May 2012, in Nokia v IPCom [full citation:  Nokia OYJ (Nokia Corporation) v IPCom GmbH & Co Kg [2012] EWCA Civ 567 (10 May 2012)]. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:00 pm by Legal Skills Prof
Here is the opening paragraph: We are writing to confirm that the decision of the United States Supreme Court issued on April 22, 2014 in Schuette v.... [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:57 pm
I am reproducing here an e-mail announcement from ADR Prof Nancy Welsh that came across the ADR listserv earlier today: Dear Colleagues:     On Friday, March 26, 2010, Penn State will hold a symposium addressing the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am by Giovanni Comandé
Dear ColleaguesI hope you find useful to have the links to the new issue of OPINIO JURIS in COMPARATIONE. once again we look forward to host contribution from our Juris Diversitatis group.If you have problems to read the post, please let me know.With my bestsciaoGiovanni #ssrnholder { font-face: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; } #ssrnholder #outline{ border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; border-color: #003366; max-width: 700px; } #ssrnholder table{ max-width: 700px;} … [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I'll address three aspects of the Valentine's Day Dear Colleague letter.First, the Dear Colleague letter states that under the 2023 SCOTUS decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:48 am by Paralegal Mentor
This is reinforced by two significant Supreme Court cases: Missouri v Jenkins and Richlin v Chertoff. [read post]