Search for: "Deas v. Deas"
Results 1 - 20
of 813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2015, 3:36 pm
EFF – “A Victory for Privacy and Transparency: HRW v. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 5:23 pm
I took a step back, still in the V between the door and the car. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
WHAT: HRW v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
” Helpfully, DEA is asking those who plan to attend the listening sessions to consider the following questions ahead of time: If telemedicine prescribing of schedule III-V medications were permitted in the absence of an in-person medical evaluation, what framework, including safeguards and data, with respect to telemedicine prescribing of schedule III-V medications do you recommend to help the agency ensure patient safety and prevent diversion of controlled… [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:08 pm
US v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:04 am
Related Issues: InternationalSurveillance and Human RightsPrivacyRelated Cases: HRW v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 7:03 pm
Marijuana, versus Prescription Drugs, versus Meth, versus Heroin, versus Cocaine DEA Chief grilled on impact of Marijuana, versus Prescription Drugs, versus Meth, versus Heroin, versus Cocaine. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 12:21 pm
Files: defendants_responses_to_plaintiffs_interrogatories_1-5.pdfletter_from_kathryn_wyer_to_mark_rumold.pdfRelated Issues: PrivacyRelated Cases: HRW v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In Soul Quest Chruch of Mother Earth, Inc. v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Rules DEA's Denial of Petition to Reschedule Marijuana Was Not Arbitrary and Capricious
25 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in Americans for Safe Access v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:11 am
An agent may telephone a pharmacy concerning a prescription for a controlled substance in schedules III through V and convey the practitioner’s otherwise valid oral prescription provided the prescriber has specified all required prescription information. 3. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:08 pm
NSA, a case filed in 2013; Jewel v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:00 pm
When the US Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 7:13 am
Yet another case: U.S. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:00 am
"Gonzales v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:25 pm
Craker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 12:51 pm
A former DEA special agent denied a promotion will receive a new trial on her Title VII race, sex and retaliation claims because the district court improperly restricted the introduction of evidence regarding a separate, ongoing race discrimination action against the DEA in which the plaintiff was class member, the Fourth Circuit held yesterday in Buckley v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Here, a telehealth practitioner may prescribe up to a 30-day supply of a schedule III-V non-narcotic controlled medication. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am
Notably, the proposed rules also give DEA-registered practitioners who have relied on the DEA’s emergency waiver—which, since January 2020, has allowed practitioners to prescribe Schedules II-V controlled substances without conducting a prior in-person medical evaluation of the patient—up to 180 days to come into compliance with the new in-person evaluation requirements that would be implemented in the final regulations. [read post]
