Search for: "Deas v. Deas"
Results 341 - 360
of 793
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 8:55 am
” The social media posts, therefore, did not meet the threshold requirement established by Pickering v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
(One for each dollar of his special assessment, on the sole reversed count).United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
. * * * *On August 15, 2002, county deputy sheriffs and agents from the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) came to Monson’s home. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 10:21 am
With the caveat that they are a little gross, so the squeamish might want to skip to the next post:The defendant (Mark Fowlkes) is a big guy, and the DEA suspects he has drugs. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 1:45 pm
Florida v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 10:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
Socha v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:14 pm
There is a lot to like about United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 12:24 pm
Though, on appeal, the Sixth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:30 am
A 2004 memo entitled “DEA- The ‘Other’ Warfighter”, states that the DEA and NSA “enjoy a vibrant two-way information-sharing relationship. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:52 pm
The DEA included him on the “Most Wanted” section of the website for the local DEA office. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm
We also know that the NSA feeds data to the DEA, where it ends up playing a part in ordinary law enforcement investigations. [read post]
30 May 2014, 10:28 am
There is no such claim.The case is Morales v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:14 am
Reasoning that the DEA agent acted merely to confirm the Fed Ex employees' recollection, the Court further held that the DEA agent's viewing `of what a private party had freely made available for his inspection did not violate the 4th Amendment. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:36 pm
But in 2010 the 6th Circuit, in United States v Warshak, ruled that email was protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
