Search for: "Deas v. Deas" Results 41 - 60 of 758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2012, 8:18 am by Paul Zukerberg - DC Marijuana Lawyer
Circuit, often called the second most important court in the land, will heard oral arguments in Americans for Safe Access v. the DEA. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 7:59 am by thehealthlawfirm
From: http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-09-12/news/os-sanford-cvs-caremark-revoke-drugs-20120912_1_revokes-prescription-drug-abuse-oxycodone-and-other-prescription Holiday CVS, L.L.C., v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:59 pm
See[www.usdoj.gov]Commentary: The DEA has gotten quite aggressive in conducting periodic site inspections of its registrants which are authorized under 21 U.S.C. 822(f). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:41 pm by Cicely Wilson
Petitioners challenged the DEA’s denial of its petition to initiate proceedings to reschedule marijuana as a Schedule III, IV, or V drug. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:12 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Search and Seizure Collective knowledge doctrine In determining whether an officer had probable cause for a warrantless search of a vehicle, information known to the DEA, which requested the stop, can be imputed to him under the collective knowledge doctrine. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 8:00 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Specifically, the amendments would: (i) limit the registrants that may provide DEA to fully registered dealers, and limit those that may use DEA to portfolio managers and restricted portfolio managers (thereby excluding exempt market dealers); (ii) require dealers to establish, maintain and apply appropriate standards for providing DEA and assess and document whether each client meets the standards; (iii) require that dealers… [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:29 am by Brian Wolfman
With that in mind, you may want to read the Fourth Circuit's recent decision in Coleman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:39 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: Below are today's tort law Appellate Court opinions: AC33030 - Deas v. [read post]