Search for: "Deas v. Deas"
Results 61 - 80
of 789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2009, 10:59 pm
See[www.usdoj.gov]Commentary: The DEA has gotten quite aggressive in conducting periodic site inspections of its registrants which are authorized under 21 U.S.C. 822(f). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:41 pm
Petitioners challenged the DEA’s denial of its petition to initiate proceedings to reschedule marijuana as a Schedule III, IV, or V drug. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm
CVS also agreed to an administrative compliance plan with the DEA. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm
CVS also agreed to an administrative compliance plan with the DEA. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
The Indictment in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 4:04 pm
Perez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 11:38 am
June 2, 2023Smolen v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:12 am
Search and Seizure Collective knowledge doctrine In determining whether an officer had probable cause for a warrantless search of a vehicle, information known to the DEA, which requested the stop, can be imputed to him under the collective knowledge doctrine. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:41 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 6:44 am
Dalia v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 8:00 am
Specifically, the amendments would: (i) limit the registrants that may provide DEA to fully registered dealers, and limit those that may use DEA to portfolio managers and restricted portfolio managers (thereby excluding exempt market dealers); (ii) require dealers to establish, maintain and apply appropriate standards for providing DEA and assess and document whether each client meets the standards; (iii) require that dealers… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:33 am
DOJ (D.D.C.) -- on third round of summary judgment, concluding that DEA properly relied on Exemption 7(E) to withhold portions of DEA’s Agents’ Manual.Ctr. for Medical Progress v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 2:52 pm
DEA-registered practitioners may issue prescriptions for all schedule II-V controlled substances to patients for whom they have not conducted an in-person medical evaluation, if all the following conditions are met: The prescription is issued for a legitimate medical purpose by a practitioner acting in the usual course of his/her professional practice; Continue reading › [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:39 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: Below are today's tort law Appellate Court opinions: AC33030 - Deas v. [read post]
Judge Rakoff Orders Discovery On Defense Claim of Racially Selective Enforcement By “Reverse Stings”
14 Nov 2019, 2:10 pm
In an Opinion and Order in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:32 am
Machado Amadis v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:58 am
Fiore v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm
Schedule I of the CSA imposes a complete criminal ban; schedules II through V allow drugs to be prescribed under certain conditions. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 6:47 am
A recent public employee free speech case, O'Dea v. [read post]
