Search for: "Deas v. Deas"
Results 81 - 100
of 803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 12:30 pm
Dissent: The Supreme Court hasn't overruled Roe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:33 am
C2R also advertised that its products meet DEA disposal standards by making drugs “scientifically irretrievable. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 6:19 pm
Marino v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:54 pm
By James V. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:45 am
City of Chicago v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 6:40 am
Kowal v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 7:29 pm
Cincinnati Enquirer v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 8:23 pm
Radio v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 10:38 am
, United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 10:33 am
The Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) stated reason for Take Back Day is to “provide opportunity to prevent drug addition and overdose deaths. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 7:36 am
Aguiar v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 5:59 pm
Burnett v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
The explanation from the court in the recent case National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 7:02 am
Huggans v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 9:10 am
v=111zsenxTcw&feature=youtu.beWe know of at least two more Black men who were misidentified and falsely arrested due to face recognition technology. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 10:41 am
This ruling is completely in line with the recent Delaware decisions, including for example the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
