Search for: "Deas v. Deas"
Results 121 - 140
of 794
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2012, 10:06 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:50 am
Common Schedule IV drugs include: Xanax Soma Darovan Darvocet Valium Ativan Ambien Tramadol Schedule V Schedule V drugs are defined as having a lower potential for abuse than Schedule IV drugs, and they consist mainly of drug preparations that contain low doses of narcotics. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 7:06 am
United States DOJ DEA, 2010 U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:59 am
Solis-Alarcón v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
DEA, 861 F.2d 72, 77 (4th Cir. 1988); accord Craker v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 5:51 am
Defendant was arrested by the DEA with a SWAT team, and he consented to a limited search and a gun was found. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:52 pm
The DEA included him on the “Most Wanted” section of the website for the local DEA office. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:45 am
Villareal v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
A DEA administrative subpoena under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:57 pm
In Wema Hoover v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
As Justice Sotomayor wrote in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 7:37 am
Djenasevic v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 11:22 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 7:06 pm
Wren v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 11:37 am
Farris v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:34 am
Gilani's presentence report which Judge Amon today authorized to be released pursuant to Giglio v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
Facts: This case (Joan Cravens Construction, Inc. et al v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:28 pm
The district court admitted the statement as a present-sense impression under Fed.R.Evid. 801(1).On appeal, the Third Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:24 am
Reel-to-reel.JPG Seventh Circuit finds admission of DEA agent's post-indictment identification of drug conspiracy defendant did not violate the defendant's Fifth Amendment Due Process rights, despite the suggestiveness that might result from his knowing he was expected to identify the defendant's voice on the tape, because it was none-the-less reliable "under the totality of circumstances" since it was based on six hours of the agent's study… [read post]
