Search for: "Deas v. Deas" Results 141 - 160 of 764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2017, 11:13 am by Philip Thomas
In April the Pearl River County Chancery Court rendered a verdict of $188,622 in Yost v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
 Section 14 DEA imposes a requirement on pornography websites to prevent access to by persons under 18; section 16 DEA permits the designation of an age-verification regulator (AVR); and, pursuant to the procedure in section 17 DEA, the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport announced in the House of Commons on 20 February 2018 that the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) was designated as the AVR. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:32 pm by Regan Zambri Long
The Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) stated reason for Take Back Day is to “provide opportunity to prevent drug addition and overdose deaths. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
Caira contends that the DEA's actions amounted to an unreasonable search. [read post]