Search for: "Deborah Pearlstein"
Results 81 - 100
of 197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Deborah Pearlstein, Benjamin N. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:26 pm
Deborah N. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 4:37 am
by Deborah Pearlstein Had the chance to catch at least one panel at yesterday’s jam-packed annual meeting of the American Society of International Law. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
Finally, returning to questions raised in Tuesday’s arguments, the Consumer Law & Policy Blog, Concurring Opinions, the Volokh Conspiracy, the Chicago Tribune, Balkinization’s Mark Tushnet and Deborah Pearlstein, and Reason all discuss the ACA’s individual mandate. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
"Teaching International Law while Confronting Current Events: Balancing Past and Present": Deborah Pearlstein (Cardozo) and Sonia E. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Deborah Pearlstein considered the speech an anti-climax, because of the many questions it fails to answer. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:01 pm
by Deborah Pearlstein Much to say on Attorney General Eric Holder’s much anticipated speech yesterday on the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
by Deborah Pearlstein For those interested in expanding their international law reading and/or writing horizons, the Virginia Journal of International Law is now welcoming submissions to its new online companion, the Virginia Journal of International Law Digest (VJIL Digest). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:30 am
Texas); Mariano Banos (Department of State); Mark Drumbl (Washington & Lee); David Glazier (Loyola); Oren Gross (Minnesota); Deborah Pearlstein (Cardozo) (left middle); Kristine Huskey (Physicians for Human Rights) (right); Kate Jastram (Berkeley) (below right); Greg McNeal (Pepperdine); Ashley Deeks (Columbia) (left); Abe Sofaer (Stanford); and Richard Wilson (American). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:59 pm
Deborah Pearlstein – Civ-Mil Relations) / Discussant: Dick Jackson, OTJAG I-Law 1140-1300 – Lunch (Darden Business School) 1300-1400 – Paper #7 (Prof. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 12:55 pm
Deborah Pearlstein. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 8:20 am
by Deborah Pearlstein In addition to Brennan’s fascinating remarks on targeting, etc. last night, which Marty reprints below, he took occasion to address the legislation now pending in Congress that aims to guide (to use a word) U.S. terrorism detention operations. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:21 pm
Professor Blum welcomes the audience back and invites Professor Dan Meltzer to introduce John Brennan. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 4:42 pm
But Deborah Pearlstein, a former associate research scholar at Princeton University, and now an assistant professor of law at Benjamin N. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:02 pm
Deborah Pearlstein and Priti Patel. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:19 am
by Deborah Pearlstein A quick note to suggest that those interested in intelligence and surveillance topics check out the latest issue of the Journal of National Security Law & Policy, which features a host of interesting articles on U.S. and international law and intelligence collection by folks like Geoff Stone, Craig Forcese, and Steve Vladeck. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:56 am
by Deborah Pearlstein Cross posted at Balkinization Big news in the past day is the Obama administration's announcement that a Somali national captured by the U.S. military somewhere in the Gulf has been transferred to New York for federal prosecution on terrorism-related charges. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 9:17 pm
Deborah Pearlstein and Ben have been exchanging posts in relation to the pending NDAA legislation and detention authority issues. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 12:59 pm
Deborah Pearlstein answers my question: Ben Wittes, long an advocate for clearer domestic legislation authorizing U.S. detention operations,writes to ask whether my recent post favoring the Senate’s over the House’s version of pending legislation signals a shift in my position opposing new such legislation. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 8:47 am
by Deborah Pearlstein Ben Wittes, long an advocate for clearer domestic legislation authorizing U.S. detention operations, writes to ask whether my recent post favoring the Senate’s over the House’s version of pending legislation signals a shift in my position opposing new such legislation. [read post]
