Search for: "Debra H. v Janice R."
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2010, 1:14 pm
The parties, Debra H. and Janice R., entered into a Vermont civil union in 2003. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:14 pm
The parties, Debra H. and Janice R., entered into a Vermont civil union in 2003. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 7:41 am
The landmark case of Matter of Debra H. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:15 pm
Debra H. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:33 pm
In Debra H. v Janice R., 14 N.Y.3d 576 (N.Y. 2010), New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals reaffirmed its rule that neither parents by the doctrine of equitable estoppel or people standing “in loco-parentis” to a child has standing to seek custody and visitation or parenting time in court. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Janice R. and Debra H. ended their relationship in 2006. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:37 pm
In the case granted review, Debra H. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:04 pm
In the first, Debra H. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:08 am
This decision (Debra H v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 2:31 pm
In Debra H. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:52 am
Marco and Ming were deemed legally married when they embarked on the surrogacy process to have a child together (see Debra H. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:52 am
Marco and Ming were deemed legally married when they embarked on the surrogacy process to have a child together (see Debra H. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:06 pm
Debra H. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The appellate court cited the 2010 decision of the Court of Appeals in Debra H. v Janice R., 14 N.Y.3d 576, 599-601, 904 N.Y.S.2d 263. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Debra H. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 9:48 am
Janice R., 2009 N.Y. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm
Debra H. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:05 am
And here is an example of creative judging, by contrast to the decision issued the same day by the Appellate Division, 1st Department, in Debra H. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 7:03 pm
In one case of Debra H. v Janice R, the Court of Appeals confirmed that “biological strangers” who had not adopted a child would not be able to proceed in court for the cases of custody and visitation. [read post]
