Search for: "Delay v. Texas"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 4:46 am
The 17.151 Motion: Texas Statute Allowing Release from Jail Because of Prosecutorial Delay This statute will not work in every situation, but it will apply in a great many cases where the non-documented immigrant is setting in a Texas jail. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:34 am
In Venture Cotton Cooperative, et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 2:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 9:57 am
The style of the case is, Sebring Apartments, et al., v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 7:28 am
Indeed, last night I wondered if the Texas court's decision could possibly delay the issuance of opinions today. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm
Meanwhile, the "invasion" issue will be before the Fifth Circuit again in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:52 am
See, United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
SB 8 remains good law in Texas today.The End of Roe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
Texas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 11:32 am
Freedom Patents LLC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:55 am
Texas and Buck v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:20 am
It is styled, Erasmo Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 10:18 am
Sounds like Bush v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:16 am
Right now, more and more jury trials in Texas criminal courts are being halted and delayed as part of the attempt to slow the spread of COVID-19. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:11 am
In Barker v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 2:58 pm
Martinez, the Texas Supreme Court issued this unanimous opinion authored by Justice Brister holding that (1) statutory penalties are proper for the delay before an interpleader is filed, but not for the time after the filing, and (2) prejudgment interest on proceeds in the court registry are barred as a double recovery.Do Not Forward: In Wachovia Bank of Delaware v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:50 pm
” This dispute turns mainly on differing interpretations of a Supreme Court order, issued June 27, 2013, as a follow-up to its earlier ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
