Search for: "Democratic Party of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Justice" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by Edward A. Fallone
The Indiana Democratic Party, among others, filed a lawsuit challenging the Indiana Voter ID law. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Democratic National Committee, which blocked a lower court order extending the deadline for mailing absentee ballots in Wisconsin’s election because of the coronavirus pandemic, “reflects Chief Justice John Roberts’ cramped view of voting rights in America, a long-held position that has often favored Republican interests. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers continue to discuss the Supreme Court’s recent announcement that it will hear a high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case from Wisconsin, Gill v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk” and “Obama’s Enforcer: Eric Holder’s Justice Department. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:45 am by Lawrence Solum
Democrats, the Department of Justice, and reform groups resisted the overreach, litigating over many of these changes. [read post]
26 May 2017, 5:08 am by Edith Roberts
Reid Wilson reports for The Hill that Cooper v. [read post]
In 2014, the Department of Justice considered the threat of voter intimidation in Arizona likely enough to warrant monitoring the area. [read post]
A Court Divided by Party.When the Justices who decided Brown v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It was energizing to see that you saw the emergence of a children’s civil rights movement and you even championed Justice Douglas’s concurrence in Wisconsin v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 10:20 am by Michael Abramowicz
Meanwhile, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is majority-Democratic and the Wisconsin Supreme Court consists of elected Justices who would thus seem unlikely to nullify the actions of voters in their states. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
  Even if a particular Justice concludes that most of Trump’s (and the Colorado Republican Party’s) many arguments are unavailing, Trump only needs to convince that Justice that one of those arguments is correct in order to preclude that Justice from voting to affirm. [read post]