Search for: "Dennis v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 794
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2015, 3:38 pm
United States, 179 U.S. 77, 84 (1900). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm
United States, concerning the treaty power. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:27 am
State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., No. 18-189 (Three good questions): Whether Administrative Patent Judges of the [PTAB] are principal Officers of the United States who must be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate under the Appointments Clause. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
United States Postal Service, et al. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 4:43 pm
Consumer Watchdog v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:47 am
By Dennis Crouch National Pasteurized Eggs v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:53 am
By Dennis Crouch Suprema, Inc. and Mentalix v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:40 pm
The United States and Canada agreed on a trade deal to preserve NAFTA on Sunday just ahead of a deadline set by the Trump administration. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 8:29 am
WNET et al. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 2:13 am
by Dennis Crouch In Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:26 am
By Dennis Crouch The recent Supreme Court decision in Already v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:42 pm
Question Presented: Whether actions to cancel or revoke a patent must be tried in Article III Courts with access to a jury under the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:46 am
by Dennis Crouch Another interesting en banc petition by Robert Greenspoon and Phil Mann: Cascades Projection v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
by Dennis Crouch Hall v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 10:21 pm
A new research dataset released by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reveals that since the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its 2010 ruling in Bilski v Kappos, the rate at which US patent applications are rejected on subject-matter grounds (as compared with other grounds of rejection) has increased from 8% to 13%. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
by Dennis Crouch Caterpillar v. [read post]
