Search for: "Dennis v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,010
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm
Cir. 2022) Having found the dispute over the ’562 patent moot, the court next considered the proper disposition—whether to simply dismiss the appeal or also vacate the PTAB decision under United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:09 am
Find that the case is moot and vacate the PTAB decisions upholding the patent under cases such as United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:33 pm
by Dennis Crouch VLSI Technology LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:31 am
by Dennis Crouch I was looking forward to the oral arguments in the interesting case of Karl Storz Endoscopy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
United States, 289 U.S. 1 (1933). [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s new decision in Medtronic v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:59 am
He concluded with a statement that action is needed, otherwise “the United States will continue to cede technological supremacy to China. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 8:35 am
by Dennis Crouch Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 38. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 2:53 pm
The order is here: Order and Memorandum Opinion –United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 10:56 am
Cir. 2013), the Federal Circuit held the expert “assumed that (1) the sales revenue reported in the customers’ Form 10-K reflected sales of products with molded chokes; and (2) each third-party product shipped into the United States contained an infringing choke. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
Finesse Wireless LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
I blogged two weeks ago about Hansen v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
In Hansen v. [read post]
