Search for: "Dennison v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 2:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tullett Prebon Plc & Ors v BGC Brokers LP & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 131 (22 February 2011) Baxter v Mannion [2011] EWCA Civ 120 (22 February 2011) PO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 132 (22 February 2011) Goad v Butcher & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 158 (22 February 2011) Bateman, R (on the application of) v South Cambridgeshire District Council [2011] EWCA Civ 157 (22… [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm by Steve Sady
” The major new case was the ground-breaking decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Alabama Department of Revenue, which asks whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors from a generally applicable sales tax constitutes discrimination against railroads; and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
Id. at 427; Dennison Mfg. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am by Matt Sundquist
ACLU of Kentucky and Van Orden v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 5:16 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ottawa Citizen and the 2006 House of Lord's decision, Jameel v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 5:06 pm
Ottawa Citizen and the 2006 House of Lord's decision, Jameel v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:27 pm
Almost ten years ago, I got involved in a knock-down, drag-out trade secrets dispute between my client, Avery Dennison, and 3M. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:44 am
The court highlighted the difference between California and federal standards regarding summary judgment/adjudication motions:"Pointing out through argument, as Avery Dennison has done, that Fotheringham has no evidence of malice and oppression or of the requisite managing agent conduct is inadequate. . . . 'Whereas, under federal law, "pointing out through argument" [citation] may be sufficient [citation], under state law, it is not.' (Id. at p. 855, fn.… [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
Giuliani’s closest aides, Dennison Young Jr., about Mr. [read post]