Search for: "Dennison v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2006, 1:55 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Ex-Cops Lose Claim That Violations of Suspected Drug Dealers' Rights Were Not 'Crimes of Violence' United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Joshua Matz
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:20 am by Santiago A. Cueto
These governments argued that: [T]he right of the United States or any other sovereign to create and enforce such a domestic remedy depends on it being able to satisfy the proper jurisdictional limits recognized by international law. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
  As Wikipedia explains, bankruptcy in the United Statesis a matter placed under federal jurisdiction by the United States Constitution (in Article 1,Section 8, Clause 4), which allows Congress to enact `uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States’. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 10:49 pm
Even if an infringing product is manufactured outside of the United States, a person infringes if he imports the product, or uses, offers to sell, or sells it in the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm by Steve Sady
” The major new case was the ground-breaking decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
Id. at 427; Dennison Mfg. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
  Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango)   Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46)   Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]