Search for: "Dent v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 1:13 pm
Pinto, “An Overview of United States Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Corporations,” 58 Am. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
Falk (Property, intangible) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of “A BRAND NAME LAW FIRM,” finding double entendre argument unappealing (TTABlog) Fame propels AUTOZONE to TTAB 2(d) victory in DENT ZONE cancellation: AutoZone Parts v Dent Zone Companies (TTABlog) TTAB affirms genericness refusal of FIREPOT for … guess what? [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:33 am
As a result, I am respectfully of the view that the Federal Court’s conclusion that the designation of the United States for the purposes of the Safe Third Country Agreement breached s. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
In Odom v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Rahman v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
For instance, in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:13 am
Evid. 403; United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 11:49 pm
With this thought in mind, I turned next to the case law of the United States. b) United States In the United States, there appear to be a number of conflicting decisions in both the liability and insurance coverage contexts regarding the issue of whether the loss of computer data or software can be considered “damage to property. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:17 pm
United States that Commerce lacked the legal authority to impose CVDs on NME imports. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:46 pm
For those who don't know the name, Ted Olson is a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, a former Solicitor General of the United States, winner of Bush v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm
Quester v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
This well-settled principle is common to the United States and India. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am
https://t.co/Ed56NMeJGm -> Barry Sookman Op-ed, Time to fix the 'value gap' – The Hill Times https://t.co/tfC392TTJA -> RIAA and MPAA Back $25 Million Piracy Verdict Against Cox https://t.co/Pxvc9omKle -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-01-08 | Barry Sookman https://t.co/hcpLsoRPds -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-01-08 https://t.co/wVx1PT7Mwk -> Fix the value gap – a reply to Michael Geist | Barry Sookman https://t.co/0DA2NPx3G3… [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
Given that Congress created the FCA’s qui tam right to bring suit in the name of the United States, Congress certainly could add conditions to safeguard the interests of the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The parties need to recognize the mutual value of cooperation; the Court cannot define it for every family unit. [read post]
