Search for: "Denver Air Center v. District Court" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2017, 5:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Darron Cummings/Associated Press) An interesting federal district court opinion handed down last week in Mueller v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:50 am by INFORRM
District Court for the District of Columbia first adult porn obscenity trial for more than two decades. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
The plaintiffs brought their suits for failure to warn, in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, but defendants removed to the federal asbestos multi-district litigation (MDL) court, invoking maritime jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
The agency’s decision was announced in a legal settlement with the Center for Biological Diversity. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:09 pm by William A. Ruskin
Antero Resources Corporation, et al., a hydro-fracking toxic tort case pending in the District Court for Denver County in Colorado. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
Antero Resources Corporation, et al., a hydro-fracking toxic tort case pending in the District Court for Denver County in Colorado. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
Antero Resources Corporation, et al., a hydro-fracking toxic tort case pending in the District Court for Denver County in Colorado. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 11:09 am by Anna Bower
In a court filing prior to the hearing, Ellis’s legal team had pointed to Georgia Court of Appeals precedent in Kenerly v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
District Court for the Central District of California, Lifoam Industries is required to pay a $450,000 penalty and must vent all of its manufacturing emissions through an air pollution control device. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
According to a complaint filed simultaneously with the settlement in federal court in the District of Columbia, between 1998 and 2006, Cummins shipped more than 570,000 heavy duty diesel engines to vehicle equipment manufacturers nationwide without pollution control equipment included, in violation of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am by Ashoka Mukpo
As months of a painful COVID-19 lockdown gave way to incandescent fury over the killing of Floyd and the violent response of the Minneapolis Police Department towards the initial protests, a few people went as far as burning police precincts or destroying upscale shopping districts. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]