Search for: "Department of Commerce v. New York"
Results 121 - 140
of 826
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2009, 6:44 pm
Supreme Court denied consideration of New York City and Washington, D.C. lawsuits, New York v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm
Today is the oral argument in one of the term’s biggest cases, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:41 am
It was created in New York by a settlor who was a New York resident. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm
New York and Rucho v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
In New York, the Act implicates Vehicle and Traffic Law sec. 388. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
New York, which the Supreme Court is expected to decide this week. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:44 pm
Third Avenue Trust v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:48 pm
In 2012 the ban became effective and was immediately challenged by a Canadian trade group, (the Association des Éleveurs de Canards et d'Oies du Québec), a New York-based foie gras producer (Hudson Valley Foie Gras, LLC), and a chain of Californian restaurants. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
City of New York, USCA, 2nd Circuit, 08-1839-cv, Decided November 11, 2010The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a District Court ruling enjoining the City of New York and the New York City Police Department from investigating and disciplining a New York City police officer based upon testimony or participation in a pending lawsuit, concluding that hearsay testimony is admissible to support the issuance of a preliminary… [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
[Professor Natelson versus Professor Ablavsky] The Indian Commerce Clause will be a major issue in the Nov. 9 Supreme Court argument in Brackeen v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
"As had the Second Department in Graham v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
The most closely-watched case was New York v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
This morning, the justices will hear 80 minutes of argument in one of the term’s marquee cases, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:07 pm
Slip Op. 04984 (June 18, 2009), New York’s Appellate Division, First Department, held that an insurer has no duty to defend its insured against an affirmative defense based on a claim of offset raised in the responsive pleadings. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm
New York. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:02 am
The Supreme Court also properly determined that personal jurisdiction over the defendants was not conferred pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(3) based upon tortious activity occurring outside New York, causing injury within New York. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:31 am
Nebgen (2nd Dept., decided 4/27/2010) In Graham v Dunkley, 50 AD3d 55 (2nd Dept. 2008), the Appellate Division, Second Department, held that "the Graves Amendment was a constitutional exercise of congressional power pursuant to the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:14 am
"That's the line-up on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
