Search for: "Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 5:52 pm
The language of the Second Circuit’s order closely tracks that of the dissenting Justices in the Supreme Court’s 5-4 order on December 8 that stayed several federal court orders in a California case (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587, Trump v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:00 pm
The brief unsigned order cited Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:34 am
Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am
At Jurist, Ryan Suto argues that Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s partial dissent in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm
The Trump Administration’s Incompetence Was the Saving Grace of 700,000 Dreamers By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps looks at the recent decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
(Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:01 am
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni looks at a recent letter to the court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 10:38 am
Regents of the University of California. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 3:56 am
” At The Regulatory Review, law student Tim Duncheon outlines why, in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:58 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie predicts that “[w]hen the decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:41 pm
Regents of the University of California. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 7:10 am
One is by the attorneys general from sixteen blue states filed in the Eastern District of New York; the other is by the Regents of the University of California filed in the Northern District of California. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:56 am
” At the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky previews Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:29 am
Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:48 am
” At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Natasha Merle and Samuel Spital suggest that last week’s decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
Regents of the University of California. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
