Search for: "Department of Public Welfare v. Couch" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2017, 2:54 am by Fraser Simpson
In order to assess whether the Rules were compatible with Article 8, the Supreme Court applied the familiar four-stage test that was adopted in both R (on the application of Quila and another) v. the Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2011] UKSC 45 and R (on the application of Bibi) v. the Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2015] UKSC 68. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:54 am by Fraser Simpson
In order to assess whether the Rules were compatible with Article 8, the Supreme Court applied the familiar four-stage test that was adopted in both R (on the application of Quila and another) v. the Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2011] UKSC 45 and R (on the application of Bibi) v. the Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2015] UKSC 68. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:47 am by Kristian Stout
Thus, if this Order follows the direction of Michigan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:47 am by Kristian Stout
Thus, if this Order follows the direction of Michigan v. [read post]